By Shameful, www.thehindu.com December 7th, 2013
This refers to the editorial “Shameful neglect” (Dec. 7), highlighting
the real and enormous consequences of open defecation in India. The challenge
is indeed profound, so we worry that your diagnosis that “in the absence of
toilets, more than 620 million people, or over half of India’s population, are
forced to practise open defecation” underestimates its complexity. In our
ongoing field research across rural north India into sanitation practices in
India, we have observed that: although some families are indeed too poor to
construct a pucca latrine, people in rural India are also unlikely to
make simple but safe and inexpensive toilets — unlike, for example in
Bangladesh, where even very poor people manage to make a latrine of some sort.
Additionally, many relatively prosperous families have not constructed a
toilet, even though they could certainly afford one. Finally, even in many
rural households that do own a working latrine, many people continue to
defecate in the open.
In many households, only children, the old, and the weak or sick, for
whom it is difficult to walk far from the house, use latrines. Others use them
to protect the modesty of young women or for the convenience of people who have
to get ready quickly in the morning for a job outside the village. However,
people who are young and healthy often report preferring to go in the fields or
the jungle — in part because of the widespread belief that open defecation is
good for health, and that using a latrine is unpleasant or disgusting.
The complexity of sanitation beliefs and practices is easy to overlook,
especially when census and survey data only count latrines owned by households,
not the behaviour of individuals. But mistaking a problem that is partially
about access and affordability for a problem that is only about access and
affordability — and thereby overlooking the challenges of changing ideas and
changing behaviours — will not eliminate the deadly and enduring consequences
of this practice. (Diane Coffey,
Aashish Gupta, Nidhi Khurana, Angshuman Phukan, Dean Spears, Nikhil Srivastav,
Sangita Vyas, Research Institute for Compassionate Economics)